IS MAHABHARATHA REAL OR FAKE?

 

If there is a word for the foremost unbelievable tale ever told – then, it's the story of the Mahabharat. There's a good discussion concerning whether or not there's any historical accuracy within the story, of religious writing. This narrative is therefore outstanding that it's created varied speculation— ‘Did it happen? Let’s notice some answers…

 

Decoding the language

It has been written within the epic from time to time that Mahabharat could be "itihas" that completely suggests that "thus occurred". The words "Puraan" and "Itihas" were specifically coined by the traditional folks to categorise the "ancient" and "recent" events. Each of the words denotes a history that has occurred at completely different times. If the intentions of the author were to put in writing a literary composition or a piece of fiction, he would have declared it to be a "mahakavya" or "katha".

 

Records of the Bharat-Dynasty

It is mentioned in Aadiparva, Adhyaya sixty-two that the records of the Bharat-Dynasty are recorded within the religious writing. Variety of dynasties with their long lineage of kings (more than fifty from Manu) are bestowed within the work. If it were simply fiction, 4-5 kings would have sufficient to make the story up.

 

Details of Kaliuga

Read the outline of Kaliyuga as mentioned in religious writing. No matter avatar, some tallies with creepy, mysterious accuracy with fashionable life because it exists these days. And bear in mind – this was written thousands of years ago! Fiction? Unlikely as a result of there are several corroborations and tallying circumstances for it to be fiction.

 

The city of Dwaraka

Marine archaeology has conjointly been utilised in an Asian country off the coast of the traditional port town of Dwaraka in Gujarat, uncovering any proof in support of statements within the religious text scriptures. A whole submerged town at Dvaraka, the traditional port town of Lord Avatar with its huge fort walls, piers, seawall has been found within the ocean the religious writing and alternative religious text literatures.

 

The unfortunate fate of Dwaraka

This Indo-Aryan verse from the Mausala Parva seven verse forty of the religious writing describes the disappearance of the town of Dvaraka into the ocean. "After all, when the folks began, the ocean flooded Dvaraka, that still teemed with wealth of each kind. Doesn't matter which portion of land was disregarded, the ocean in real time flooded the land with its waters."

 

Ancient cities delineate within the Mahabharatha

More than 35 sites in the North Asian country have yielded archaeologic proof and are known as ancient cities delineate within the Mahabharatha. Copper utensils, iron, seals, gold & silver ornaments, terracotta discs and painted gray ware pottery have all been found in these sites. Scientific geological dating of those artifacts corresponds to the non-aryan-invasion model of Indian antiquity.

 

Similarity between Sanskrit literature and religious writing

The dynasties recorded within the Ramayan and also the Mahabharat concur while not making a distinction. Even the relations between completely different kings and their dynasties match each other's nice "epics" match with one another. If each were mere "epics" written by 2 entirely different people at 2 different times, why would everything match even up to minor details? Mahabharat is of a later date than the Ramayan. Why would the author of the Mahabharat borrow similar ideas and characters as those of the author of Ramayana?

 

The lineage of Shri avatar

The Greek student Megasthenes has declared that Chandragupta Maurya was the 138th King within the lineage of Shri avatar. This suggests that the Shri avatar did exist within the bygone era in which Mahabharat did extremely occur.

 

Present cities from Mahbaharata

All places mentioned in religious writing are real places, all are known as real places. As an example, Hastinapur is in UP. Indraprastha is that the gift day of the Old Delhi. Dwarka is found on the Gujarat coast. Moreover, religious writing cities don't seem to be restricted to a single Asian country as a result of religious writing referring to the Indian landmass as Bharata. For instance, Gandhar might be a gift day of Kandhar.

 

Astronomical references

The Udyoga Parva of religious writing narrates that, simply before the war, Lord avatar visited Hastinapur within the month of Kartika on the day when the moon was at the asterism Revati. On his thanks to Hastinapur, the avatar took rest for daily at an area referred to as Brikasthala, and on that day the moon was at the asterism Bharani.

 

A perfect narration of the planetary positions

Krishna left Sanskrit literature with Karna on the day when the moon was nevertheless to succeed in the asterism Uttara Phalguni. Karna accompanied him to ways to ascertain Him of and he then delineated to the Lord the positions of planets within the sky and expressed his apprehension that such a planetary configuration stood for terribly unhealthy omen: like massive scale loss of life and soaking of blood. Vyasa narrated these planetary positions in as many as sixteen verses as if somebody was describing it when visualizing them within the sky.

 

Bharat Varsh

The country is known as Bhaarat when the king of India (son of Dushyant & Shakuntala) was born there. What country would be named when the hero of a novel!

 

Hole within the Aryan theory

European students brought the unsettled Aryan tribes into the Asian country when 1500 B.C. However, might these Aryans produce the Indo-Aryan language, gain most information and write these texts before 700 BC? Nice Indian thinkers together with Lokmanya Tilak, Sri Arbindo, and Dyanand Hindu deity rejected the ecu theory.

 

The Mahabharata is written in verses.

It is ridiculous to mention that these texts are fiction as a result of its poetic nature. It had been a custom to put in writing everything (even mathematical kindulae) in poetic form.

 

Unrecorded history issue

Maurya, Gupta and Indo-Greek dynasties are also recorded in our Puraanas. These dynasties are accepted solely as a result of the fact that they're jointly recorded by Greek historians. What concerning the dynasties that existed.